Candidate Works
Candidates complete a real-world engineering task using their usual development tools, including AI.
Go beyond the final submission. See how candidates think, build, and work with AI backed by evidence from their development process.
Dipin captures how candidates approach real engineering tasks and turns their development process into evidence your team can evaluate.
Candidates complete a real-world engineering task using their usual development tools, including AI.
Dipin analyzes how candidates build from code changes and iterations to technical decisions and AI usage.
Get an evidence-backed report showing each candidate's strengths, risks, and engineering competencies and the evidence behind them.
See how candidates solve realistic work with AI—not what they memorized for a test.
Understand the engineering judgment behind the final submission across six core dimensions.
Does the solution actually solve the problem?
Is data structured with intention and integrity?
How does the engineer handle failure and edge cases?
Can others understand, maintain, and extend the work?
Are technical trade-offs made appropriately?
Does the engineer use AI with independent judgment?
Don't just see the score. Understand what happened during development and why it matters.
Reviews and verifies AI-generated solutions before adoption.
Candidate identified an unhandled collision case in the AI-generated implementation and revised the solution before submission.
Demonstrates proactive edge-case reasoning and independent verification rather than accepting generated code as-is.
Turn development activity into evidence your hiring team can trust.
For technical support or inquiries regarding the assessment process, please contact support@dipin.io.